Class 1d

Couple has highway encounter near Big Thicket National Preserve.

Report#
01120093
Occurred Fall 2003
(Submitted November 30, 2012)

Witness Observation

In the Fall of 2003, my wife and I were driving on FM 1276 near the Big Sandy Creek unit of the Big Thicket National Preserve after sunset. (It was almost fully night.) We both witnessed a bipedal animal run across the road in front of us. It was running on two legs but ran in a bent over posture with its arms near or on the pavement sometimes. It ran very quickly and well. The animal was around 5 feet in height and covered with long reddish brown hair. It had a very broad build and looked somewhat like an orangutan except that it had a flat face and was proportioned more like a human with long arms. It had entered the road in front of us from the driver's side, ran across the road, and paused briefly on the other side of the road to look at us before entering the woods. It looked at us by turning its body partially. I had braked as it entered the road and passed it just after it entered the edge of the woods.

Physical Evidence

My father saw the animal in a separate incident that week at the same location. He also knows a woman who saw the animal as well.

Time and Conditions

Just after sunset. - It was barely dark not too long after sunset. I was using headlights.

Investigator's Comments

Michael C. Mayes

This interview was conducted as a result of an alleged sighting of a large, upright biped that matches the description of a wood ape in Polk County, Texas in the fall of 2003.

I interviewed the witness via telephone on the evening of Tuesday, February 26, 2013. The witness was friendly, open and cooperative. The wife of the reporting witness also participated in the interview as she too saw the animal in question while riding with her husband in 2003. For the purposes of this report the husband will be referred to as witness #1 and the wife as witness #2.

The couple was driving southbound on FM 1276 near the Big Sandy Creek Unit of the Big Thicket National Preserve just after sunset. Witness #1 did not recall the exact time but noted that it was almost fully dark. As their vehicle approached a slight bend in the road, witness #1, who was driving, caught sight of movement on the left side of the road. He described seeing something moving quickly toward the road. Witness #1 said there was an open field bound by a barbed-wire fence at this spot and, while he could not be positive, said he felt the figure had jumped over the fence ?like a hurdler? based on how it was moving/landing when he first caught site of it. Witness #1 also felt this was a strong possibility since the figure was moving very quickly and he does not believe anyone, or anything, could have generated that much speed from a standing position so close to the road if they were not already running all out. Witness #1 slowed his vehicle immediately as it became clear the figure?s momentum was going to carry it into his path. Witness #1 recalled seeing the figure clear a ditch and come onto the paved shoulder of the road in a bipedal fashion. Upon reaching the paved portion of the road, the figure dropped down and quickly crossed in front of the vehicle on all fours. Witness #1 said the figure actually seemed to pick up speed after it dropped down to all fours. He noted that the hands?witness #1 did consciously use the word ?hands??really only touched the ground ?a couple of times? as the figure smoothly crossed the road (see also NAWAC report 01040029). By this point witness #1 had slowed to almost a complete stop. The figure continued off the pavement onto the other side of the road and paused just outside the wood line. It was at this point that witness #2, riding on the passenger side of the front seat of the vehicle, got her first good look at the subject. According to the pair, the subject squatted briefly and turned back to look at their vehicle. It then stood up and walked on two legs into the woods.

The pair described the figure they saw in similar terms. Both agreed that it likely was no more than about five feet tall and covered in reddish-brown hair. Witness #1 described the hair as being ?the same color as an orangutan.? He specifically remembered the hair being very long and hanging down from, the arms of the figure. The build of the figure was described as stocky and muscular. The witnesses agreed that the head of the figure was somewhat pointed and that it had a ?tall forehead.? The couple did get a brief look at the face of the figure when it turned back to look at them and said it was human-like. When asked what was ?human-like? about the face, the witnesses specifically mentioned the nose. The observers described the nose as flat and wide and ?not like a gorilla.? Witness #1 expounded on that point a bit more, saying, ?You know how you can look at a gorilla?s face and look right into the nostrils? This wasn?t like that. It was like a person?s nose but wide and flat.? Both witnesses insisted there was no hint of a snout of any kind.

Witness #1 said that the locomotion of the figure was very smooth and impressively fast. He said the speed of the figure was comparable to that of a deer running across the road. Witness #1 also wanted to stress that the figure seemed to speed up when it dropped to all fours and that it didn?t ?bound? across the road like a chimpanzee or gorilla would. It stayed low and moved smoothly with no ?bouncing.? The bipedal movement was described in much the same way: smooth and quick. When asked if the figure they saw could have been a cinnamon-colored black bear, witness #1 politely, but very firmly, said, ?No.? He stressed that when the figure stood up and walked on two legs it did not move like a bear on two legs and it had a good stride without any side to side ?wobble.?

The witnesses both agreed that when the figure squatted down and turned back to look at them that it was, ?stiff-necked.? It turned its entire upper torso back toward the road when it peeked back at the vehicle. At this point, both witnesses recalled seeing very bright eye-shine. Witness #1 did not recall the color but remembered seeing the eye-shine very clearly. Witness #2, who was sitting on the passenger side of the vehicle closest to the animal when it turned to look at them, recalled the shine being a very bright ?yellowish? color. Witness #1 was impressed by the bright shine as by this time they had pulled even with the figure and it was no longer being completely illuminated by the headlights of the vehicle.

Witness #1 added that two more people in the community, including his own father, claimed to have seen a figure matching the same description within two weeks of his encounter. To the best of his knowledge, no one in the community has seen anything similar since then.

Witness #1 grew up in the area and has hunted and hiked the woods, including the Big Sandy Creek Unit of the Big Thicket National Preserve, all of his life. He is familiar with the known fauna in the area. He claims he has never seen anything before, or since, like what saw on that fall night back in 2003.

I did not detect any signs of deception on the part of either witness during the course of the interview. Going into the interview, I felt it was possible the couple had encountered a cinnamon-colored black bear. Black bears are native to the area in question and, though all but extirpated from the region for the better part of the last seventy-five years, have been making a comeback of late. After thoroughly discussing the possibility of a misidentified bear with the witnesses, I feel satisfied that what they encountered in 2003 was not a bear. The smooth transition from bipedal locomotion to quadrupedal locomotion and back again along with the witnesses? adamant assertion that the figure they saw had a nose and not a snout has convinced me of this. This description of the figure?s appearance and modes of locomotion would also seem to eliminate the possibility that any of the region?s other known wildlife was seen and misidentified.

The NAWAC continues to collect and investigate reports of encounters?both contemporary and historical?with strange, bipedal, ape-like creatures in Polk County and surrounding Big Thicket Counties. This part of Southeast Texas continues to make up the most prolific region in the four-state area for reports of encounters with creatures fitting the traditional description of the wood ape or sasquatch.

631px-map_of_texas_highlighting_polk_county

Polk County, Texas is in Southeast Texas.

Big_sandy_creek_map

A map of the Big Sandy Creek Unit of the Big Thicket National Preserve.

Big_thicket_woods

The view from the highway of the Big Thicket.

Big_thicket_b

Source: Gunter, Pete, The Big Thicket: A Challenge for Conservation, Jenkins Publishing Company, Austin, 1971, pp. 46-47.

Additional reports in this county

Occurred 2/15/1993 in Polk County, TX

Submitted on May 8, 2006 Icon-photo-off Icon-video-off

Newspaper deliveryman has early morning road encounter near Alabama-Coushatta Reservation. Read more...

Occurred 1996 in Polk County, TX

Submitted on October 17, 2005 Icon-photo-off Icon-video-off

Family has daytime sighting traveling south on highway 59. Read more...

Occurred 3/2005 in Polk County, TX

Submitted on May 8, 2005 Icon-photo-off Icon-video-off

Single car accident in Big Thicket National Preserve. Read more...

Occurred 4/7/2005 in Polk County, TX

Submitted on April 20, 2005 Icon-photo-off Icon-video-off

While biking to work, man hears loud animal shadowing him in woods along Highway 190. Read more...

Occurred 3/2005 in Polk County, TX

Submitted on April 18, 2005 Icon-photo-off Icon-video-off

Teen has sighting through bedroom window. Read more...

Occurred 11/1972 in Polk County, TX

Submitted on August 6, 2002 Icon-photo Icon-video-off

Three family members have encounter near Segno in what is now the Big Thicket National Preserve. Read more...

Occurred 1964 in Polk County, TX

Submitted on November 9, 1997 Icon-photo-off Icon-video-off

As a child, witness has encounter at cemetery. Read more...

Submit-incident
Nawac_become-member

close

Class 1a
A sasquatch/bigfoot specimen has been collected (alive or dead).
Class 1b
A report investigation results in a sasquatch observation or the documentation of clear tracks or other forms of physical evidence by an investigator.
Class 1c
An investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot by a very reliable observer is a distinct possibility, tangible corroborating evidence is documented, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
Class 1d
A visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility involving two or more reliable observers, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
Class 2
Investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility, the observer is exceptionally trustworthy, professionally trained, and experienced in the outdoors and/or is accustomed to looking for and recording details (e.g., biologist, anthropologist/archaeologist, ranger, trapper/tracker/seasoned hunter, bird watcher, game warden, naturalist, law enforcement), and other explanations can be reasonably excluded.
Class 3a
Investigator determines that a visual encounter with a sasquatch/bigfoot is a distinct possibility, the observer is credible, and all other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
Class 3b
Unidentifiable vocalizations were reported and there is accompanying tangible evidence to possibly indicate the presence of a sasquatch/bigfoot, the observer is very reliable, and other sources can be reasonably ruled out.
Class 3c
No visual encounter occurred, but physical evidence was found to indicate the presence of a sasquatch/bigfoot (tracks, hair, scat, etc.), the observer is very reliable, and other sources can be reasonably ruled out.